Translate This Blog

Saturday, May 9, 2009

To Specialize Or Not

Here's a recent comment that I thought warranted further discussion.

I'm quite surprised they don't offer more specialization since as a vet it seems you can go into a variety of different speciality areas (my neighbor is a large animal vet). Do you think if they retained the basics for every major area, but included more specialization it might increase the productivity of vets?

Veterinary medicine has changed a lot in the last 100 years. When our society was more rural, veterinarians were mostly working on the farm animals, and would see the dogs and cats while they happened to be on the farm. In the last 50-60 years, our culture has dramatically shifted to animals being pets and family members, not livestock and workers. This has also changed the focus of veterinarians and where you find most of them. In 1909 most vets will have been found working the farms. In 2009 most of them will be working on companion animals.

Almost every veterinary school in the US started with an agriculture land grant and that bias still shows. Vets are also the leading experts in diagnosing emerging serious diseases in animals, especially those transmittable to humans (swine flu, avian flu, etc.). By having the knowledge of all species, we have a better ability to observe and report these diseases, thus upholding the part of our veterinary oath that involves protecting the public health. As a secondary point, having the training we receive in school allows us much more flexibility to pursue a myriad of career options, often different from where we thought we would be when we graduated.

On the flip side is the argument that we simply have to know too much. Think about everything a MD has to know about human anatomy, physiology, and medicine. Now take that same depth of knowledge and apply it to a dozen different species that have radical differences. Cram all of this training in the same time it takes human medical students to learn their one species, and you get an idea of the difficulty involved in obtaining a veterinary degree. Many people argue that because the nature of veterinary practice has changed, there should be a "limited licensure" that allows vets to practice on certain species to the exclusion of others. For example, I would have a license that allowed me to practice on companion animals and pets, but not livestock.

There are good arguments on both sides of the issue, and it has been a hot-button topic in the field for several years now. On one side I can understand the historic and current need for vets to monitor all kinds of animals for diseases and general public health (including food inspection). Yet on the other side I remember only tiny details of my training in livestock, and can never see myself working with those animals again. I'm not sure that that part of my training has ever been useful to me.

So back to the comment...we already get basic training in all major areas, and do have the opportunity for certain amounts of electives to direct part of our interests and education. For example, I took electives in ultrasound, avian medicine, and exotic pets because I had interests in these areas. Some of my classmates took extra classes on equine or large animal medicine and surgery. I can't say that any of this "specialization" is really going to increase our productivity greatly, though it did help me start off with more knowledge in the areas I thought I might practice.

By the time I retire in another 25-30 years, I fully expect the profession to be radically changed from what it is today. We'll see what changes happen and how future veterinarians are trained.


  1. When checking out a vet school, this looks like an awesome place to begin your academic program! The True Blue Campus at St. Georges University.

  2. Thanks for the reply! I'm actually a student at a very large school that got it's start as a land grant facility as well.

    When I first adopted Sirius someone recommended a particular practice here in town and not knowing anyone there I had no problem when they told me only one vet had appointments during the time I needed in. When I get there the vet was completely mortified by my dog and refused to touch him for his initial exam. I found out a few weeks later, after switching vets, this particular woman just got out of a cat only practice and didn't like dogs.

    I didn't understand why she agreed to see my german shepherd if she was scared of large dogs (or dogs in general, she doesn't like my neighbor's little mix dog either). This same vet is wonderful with another friend's cats though.

    I understand vets are human and will have their favorites as far as species to treat, but a courtesy would be not to take a dog into an exam room if you don't feel comfortable with the breed. (Sirius is always an angel at the vet, by the way, so it was nothing he did).

    Sorry for the small rant, but that's what brought the idea of specialization to mind for me :-)

  3. I agree that if you're going to accept patients, you need to be willing to see them. After graduation, there are options to become board specialized, meaning that you have training and experience beyond basic veterinary school. Most feline practitioners are NOT board-certified, and have just chosen to work with the one species. I have no problem with that, but if you're not working in a feline-only practice you darn well better be prepared to see dogs of all kinds. That's just the nature of the business.

    I've often joked that I'm going to open the first dog-only practice. ;)


Thank you for making a comment on my blog! Please be aware that due to spammers putting links in their comments I moderate every comment. ANY COMMENTS WITH AN EXTERNAL LINK NOT RELATED TO THE TOPIC WILL LIKELY BE DELETED AND MARKED AS SPAM. If you are someone who is posting links to increase the traffic to another website, save me and you the time and hassle and simply don't comment. To everyone else.....comment away! I really do enjoy hearing from readers!