Translate This Blog

Saturday, December 6, 2014

Nutrition Mythbusting....Current Pet Food Fads

Every time I write about pet nutrition I get people commenting about how I'm full of crap and obviously don't know a thing about pet foods and what goes into them.  Time to walk that path again.
This post comes from a question sent to me by Sharron....
Hi Dr Bern: lexee is a yorkie/chihuahua 5 yrs old - my problem is i don't what to feed her - she is SO fussy when it comes to dry dog food. Of all the dry foods i have tried i always go back to Royal Canin.
But of course i have gotten raked over the coals because so many people believe it's a horrible food. Today i was asked if i'm trying to kill her by feeding her RC. I try not to get wrapped up in the holistic, organic etc trend. I think RC is fine. Lexee likes it but i still wonder if she should be on grain free - she doesn't have allergies. She also likes Hills Healthy Advantage Small Bites. Can you set me straight on these foods. Are they good foods to feed. Thankyou.
Before I get into the meat of my post, let me first stated that my opinions are formed by listening to and reading articles from board-ceritified nutritional specialists and internal medicine specialists.  My sources are reputable and experts in their field.  Before you disparage and dismiss those folks, remember that these are veterinarians who have studied for 5-6 years after vet school in a very specific field and then have passed rigorous exams where the pass rate is around 40%.  If you ignore their opinions, you are throwing away the views and knowledge of the people doing the reasearch that everyone else follows.

Okay, that's out of the way.  I had to throw that in there because I inevitably get people who think what I say is uninformed hogwash and my sources obviously don't know what they're doing and are shills for the food companies.

Sharron, here's the simple version....the people who are giving you advice don't really understand what they're talking about and you shouldn't listen to them.  Keep doing what you're doing.

Now the long version. 

The whole "grain-free" diet trend we've seen in the last couple of years is purely a fad without any real scientific basis.  It's perpetuated by people who have incomplete understanding of the gentics and digestive physiology of dogs, and often by pet food companies trying to sell food by playing on client fears.  So why is this such a popular trend?  From my personal experience this trend started as a result of two things, both incorrect. 

First, there is a percpetion that because dogs are descended from wolves we need to feed them something similar to the diet of their wild anscestors.  Since wolves don't eat wheat, rice, and corn, we need to be feeding grain-free diets.  The problem with this idea is that it's completely wrong.  Dogs are not wolves.  Yes, they are very similar and have a nearly identical physiology, but there are also significant differences.  Dogs have been domesticated for 10,000-15, 000 years, and in that time have been exposed to diets much higher in grains than what wolves eat.  Scientists have identified differences in several key genes in dogs related to starch digestion and glucose uptake.  This means that dogs have developed so they have a much better ability to handle grain-based diets than do wolves.  It also means that there is no benefit to feeding a grain-free diet over one with grains.

Second, there is a misconception that grains cause food allergies.  This is blatantly untrue.  It's the same as saying that a bee sting causes someone to be allergic to bees.  In any of these allergies the person/animal is already genetically predisposed to the allergy, and exposure to the allergen can trigger the reaction.  The bee didn't cause the person to be allergic; the person was already allergic and the sting simply triggered a genetic tendency.  It's the same way with food allergies.  If a dog has allergies to grains, it means that they had genes already in their body which would trigger a reaction after repeated exposure to the allergen.  Grains will absolutely not cause an allergy in a dog with no genetic predisposition, just like a bee sting wouldn't result in anaphylaxis in a person without an allergy to it.  Additionally, not every food allergy is to grains, and even if it is, it is usually to specific grains.  Wheat is indeed a common allergen, but beef and chicken are even more likely to cause a problem.  A grain-free diet is only of benefit if the dog has an already documented allergy to the grain in question.  For your average dog there is no need to limit this ingredient.

Now let's talk about Royal Canin specifically.  I think it's an excellent food, as does every nutritional specialist with whom I've ever consulted.  It is what I chose to feed my own dogs and cats, and I don't work for the company or get any financial incentives for recommending it.  I just believe in it that much.  When ever I've talked to veterinary nutritionists and asked which foods they recommend. Royal Canin is always near or at the top of the list. 

Royal Canin is a great food for a number of reasons.  They use high quality ingredients and pay particular attention to the needs and eating habits of specific breeds.  They put a lot of attention on palatability, which is why they guarantee a dog or cat will eat it.  They are highly involved with quality control on their foods.  And they are supported by the Waltham Foundation, which has been one of the premiere animal nutrition research facilities in the world for several decades.  Besides being one of the leaders in nutritional research, the Waltham Centre has always impressed me by how they take animal welfare into account when conducting research.  I would really challenge anyone to be intellecually honest and find serious fault with the research and findings of this group.

Yes, I know like I sound like I'm trying to promote Royal Canin and Waltham and that I work for them.  I assure you that I don't, and that it just comes from carefully looking into pet foods and this company in particular for over 10 years.

Sharron, I'm curious as to why some of the people you talk to think that Royal Canin is so horrible and detrimental to dogs.  I can almost guarantee it is because of some passionately held misinformed beliefs.  Personally, I think you're feeding one of the best dog foods on the market, and wouldn't recommend changing anything that you are doing.

Now I wonder how long it will be before someone starts commenting on how horrible and ignorant I am.......


  1. I was just reading an article about that today in New Zealand - "should your pet be eating a paleo diet?"
    As a vet, I feed all my dogs on premium dried food - and have had a great run with them health wise. However, If they developed skin problems or allergies I would certainly investigate other options. I have advocated raw diets when I was in practice, but I saw too many issues with bones - and I feel that excess red meat is not enough either . I don't miss the days of dealing with the problems caused by imbalanced home based diets!.
    If people are careful about infection risk/ parasites, I guess they can feed what they like but most people lack the nutritional knowledge to make sure it is balanced. Like many vegetarian people having to take extra care to get balanced protein and iron etc... pets need the same care too.

  2. I think people need to feed what works best for their dog, not necessarily what they are comfortable feeding.

    If a dog has had recurring sensitivies to both environment and diet - and kibble, after kibble, after kibble has been tried, then why not move to a raw or home cooked diet and see what works? Alleviating the food sensitivities and strengthening the immune system will also help with environmental sensitivities.

    For some dogs, they do fine on RC (and I will add, that I would never, ever recommend RC as a kibble. Even while traveling in Europe, I chose Eukaneuba, not that I agree with the quality either, but there are very few choices there). Others, would be oily, smelly and yeasty on that kibble, but do fine on say Acana. And visa versa.

    I have seen dogs do very well on raw diets, but even better when switched to home cooked diet. Again, I have seen the opposite as well.

    What the dog thrives on, is what should be taken into account ;)

    I have fed raw (with kibble here and there as needed)for the last 8 years and will never look back. I have seen the benefits to all of my dogs, none of which have allergies or sensitivities. My dogs thrive on a raw diet and have had no vet visits unrelated to regular check ups (limited vaccination as well), breeding and health testing. When I look at my dogs (and when my vet looks at my dogs) it is obvious they are thriving.

    We also have to keep in mind genetics play a huge part in all over health - so diet can't control everything. But it can definitely help!

    I hope that no one would comment on how "horrible" you are - I think you have a great blog and share your information freely and with great care. Even if we don't like the same kibble (or even another topic), that doesn't make you ignorant LOL

    Thanks for sharing your posts, I quite enjoy them!

  3. Niomi, I really appreciate the comments! I completely agree that every pet is an individual, and what works great for one may not be for another. We can make certain generalities with our patients, but in the end we have to look at that pet as a single individual and not just a number. And I can really appreciate your attitude on this. I'm always willing to have a rational discussion with people, even if we may end up disagreeing. Believe me, I've had plenty of people call me names and say how ignorant I was on this very blog. Go back and search for some of the older discussions on nutrition and see what I mean!

  4. Yeah I found this article is really working for me.Got my actual solution for my dog.Thanks a lot for this writing.Ever grateful...


Thank you for making a comment on my blog! Please be aware that due to spammers putting links in their comments I moderate every comment. ANY COMMENTS WITH AN EXTERNAL LINK NOT RELATED TO THE TOPIC WILL LIKELY BE DELETED AND MARKED AS SPAM. If you are someone who is posting links to increase the traffic to another website, save me and you the time and hassle and simply don't comment. To everyone else.....comment away! I really do enjoy hearing from readers!